At the 25th anniversary memorial of the September 11 terrorist attacks, Donald Trump, the President of the United States, and Pete Hagest, the Secretary of Defense, took the opportunity to defend the ongoing war with Iran. Instead of focusing on the victims of that tragic day, the two officials tried to present this war as part of the legacy of the worst terrorist attack in U.S. history.
Strange Link to History
While memorial ceremonies typically focus on remembering the victims and the grief of their families, Trump and Hagest clearly referenced a war that began over six months ago and is still ongoing. This action raises many questions, especially given that this war faces public discontent.
Criticism of this approach is particularly increasing in the political atmosphere of the United States. Many believe that using historical memorials to justify wars is not only inappropriate but can also have negative effects on public opinion. With these statements, Trump and Hagest effectively attempted to justify their war policies based on a national tragedy.
Military Achievements and Consequences
While Trump and Hagest seek to justify this war, criticisms from opponents and civil society are also on the rise. Many believe that this war not only does not contribute to national security but could lead to further tensions in the region. Instead of focusing on the human and economic consequences of the war, these two officials are trying to create a link between it and the 9/11 attacks.
Ultimately, it remains to be seen whether this defensive strategy can convince public opinion to support the war with Iran or whether it will lead to increased discontent. With this situation continuing, the war with Iran could become one of the contentious issues in future elections.
